How can we help? Contact us
As per the tax treaty between the Netherlands and Belgium, a permanent establishment is defined as a fixed place of business through which an enterprise conducts all or part of its business activities. This definition closely aligns with that of the OECD Model Tax Convention and serves as the foundation for assessing whether a home office can be classified as a permanent establishment. The agreement distinguishes between various telework scenarios.
The agreement distinguishes between various telework scenarios. In instances of intermittent telework, where employees work from home sporadically or only occasionally, and telework is not a routine part of their work schedule, the home office is not deemed at the disposal of the employer. Consequently, there is no permanent establishment in this scenario.
In cases of structured telework, where employees regularly work from home but also have the option to work on-site, the home office typically does not fall under the employer's control. However, this changes if the employer explicitly mandates that the employee work from home, making the home office an actual hub for the enterprise's activities. In such circumstances, the home office may be considered a permanent establishment.
When employees are compelled to telework as part of their regular duties, and the home office is under the employer's control, the establishment of a permanent presence becomes more likely. This situation may arise, for example, when telework is contractually stipulated or when the employer lacks workspace at its premises in the country where the enterprise is based. The assessment of whether a home office constitutes a permanent establishment hinges on the specific factual circumstances and must be conducted on an individual basis.
In addition to addressing the aforementioned scenarios, the agreement also offers practical guidance. For example, it states that if an employee works from their home office for 50% or less of their total working hours in a year, it will not be considered a permanent establishment. Furthermore, it clarifies that if the activities performed at the home office are of a supporting or ancillary nature, they will not lead to the establishment of a permanent presence. Such activities could encompass secretarial, IT, or HR support for the enterprise's primary operations.
The accord between the Netherlands and Belgium carries direct implications for employers and employees engaged in cross-border telework. If a home office is deemed a permanent establishment, the employer may incur tax liability in the country where the establishment is situated. There may also be tax consequences for employees, such as liability for income earned through the permanent establishment. Hence, it is vital for employers and employees to be cognizant of the potential tax consequences associated with cross-border telework.
The understanding reached between the Netherlands and Belgium concerning teleworking employees and the establishment of permanent establishments offers employers and employees greater clarity on the tax implications of cross-border telework. By distinguishing between different telework scenarios and providing practical guidelines, employers can take appropriate tax measures and educate employees about their tax responsibilities.
Nevertheless, it is imperative to recognize that the assessment of whether a home office qualifies as a permanent establishment hinges on the specific factual circumstances and necessitates individualized determination. Therefore, seeking professional advice is advisable in cases of uncertainty.